I've attached a picture of some typical values from the data log showing how the advance rockets up once Cam % hits about 90%.
Variable cam advance is only available on the intake on this engine (flat 6) .
I'm not using the position signal from the second cam, and have wired the single DTA output to operate both intakes cams.
Cam Advance Leading to Cam Signal Errors
-
- Posts: 1622
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 1:03 pm
- ECU Model: S40 Pro
- Distributor: DTA
- Firmware Version: 79
Re: Cam Advance Leading to Cam Signal Errors
Some people believe that wasted spark burns the exhaust gases better, as you get the second spark on the exhaust stroke. I have no real world data to prove or disprove that.
I can see the problem with your cams. You haven't turned on the PID loop.
However, your target map isn't ideal, so it won't work very well if you do. You'll need to refine that a bit first. I don't have the target maps for that engine, but you may be able to find them online. If not, just smooth out what you have, and then turn on the PID loop.
I need to write an article on how cam control works, as it's asked quite often.
I can see the problem with your cams. You haven't turned on the PID loop.
However, your target map isn't ideal, so it won't work very well if you do. You'll need to refine that a bit first. I don't have the target maps for that engine, but you may be able to find them online. If not, just smooth out what you have, and then turn on the PID loop.
I need to write an article on how cam control works, as it's asked quite often.
Re: Cam Advance Leading to Cam Signal Errors
Thanks I'll smooth it out, I've got an idea of how it should look from a technical description.
With the PID loops settings is it sensible to only allow values between say 88% and 95%, as that was the response range without the PID loop in place?
With the PID loops settings is it sensible to only allow values between say 88% and 95%, as that was the response range without the PID loop in place?
-
- Posts: 1622
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 1:03 pm
- ECU Model: S40 Pro
- Distributor: DTA
- Firmware Version: 79
Re: Cam Advance Leading to Cam Signal Errors
No.
85% to 95% PWM will advance the cam. 50% will keep it where it is. Lower will retard it.
The base PWM map can only fully advance or retard the cam, it cannot control it. Most often this is just set to 90% in order to get the cams to move quickly in the area the cams need to move.
Then the ECU uses the target map, which is in degrees of advance, to move the cams to the target position. This is the critical map.
85% to 95% PWM will advance the cam. 50% will keep it where it is. Lower will retard it.
The base PWM map can only fully advance or retard the cam, it cannot control it. Most often this is just set to 90% in order to get the cams to move quickly in the area the cams need to move.
Then the ECU uses the target map, which is in degrees of advance, to move the cams to the target position. This is the critical map.
Re: Cam Advance Leading to Cam Signal Errors
Ran it today with PID activated, the standard PID control didn't seem to track target cam advance, but when I changed it to use modified PID, it worked a treat!
I haven't had time yet to build an optimised cam target map, the Toyota-2ZZ target looked a reasonable start point so I tried this with great mid range results. A bit of tweaking to do but its looking good !
I haven't had time yet to build an optimised cam target map, the Toyota-2ZZ target looked a reasonable start point so I tried this with great mid range results. A bit of tweaking to do but its looking good !
-
- Posts: 1247
- Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 4:10 am
- ECU Model: S100 Pro
- Distributor: None-Coil On Plug :)
Re: Cam Advance Leading to Cam Signal Errors
I've never used cam advance but I think you need to use the real time chart and the knobs box set to use cam timing on one knob to swing the cam target around and then adjust the PID controls so that you get the best response you can.
This is before you do any power runs.
Then I'd be inclined to do power sweeps with different cam timing to then build a picture of what the engine likes at various rpms.
But like I say I've never had cam advance!
This is before you do any power runs.
Then I'd be inclined to do power sweeps with different cam timing to then build a picture of what the engine likes at various rpms.
But like I say I've never had cam advance!
Re: Cam Advance Leading to Cam Signal Errors
Yes, my next job is to do some full and part throttle power runs at various cam advance settings to get an idea as to what works best where.
-
- Posts: 1247
- Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 4:10 am
- ECU Model: S100 Pro
- Distributor: None-Coil On Plug :)
Re: Cam Advance Leading to Cam Signal Errors
Using the knobs box and cam on the knob should speed up many of the light throttle sites settings.
- ignitionautosport
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 5:30 am
- ECU Model: S80 Pro
- Location: New Zealand
- Contact:
Re: Cam Advance Leading to Cam Signal Errors
The manual outlines how to set it up very well; I'd be tweaking the PID so it's perfect tracking (as Rob already said), then set Fuel to closed loop and adjust cam target on the fuel knob. That way when you are changing the cam timing the fueling adjusts to suit by itself - at least in the lighter load sites, you may not want to use closed loop when doing power runs naturally.
| '94 GSR Lancer | '96 Toyota Carib 20V | '83 Toyota Starlet | www.ignitionautosport.co.nz |