Whats currently on the high priority list?
Just so we can have some idea of what to look forward too.
Feature Request thread ( make sticky )
-
- Posts: 1622
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 1:03 pm
- ECU Model: S40 Pro
- Distributor: DTA
- Firmware Version: 79
Re: Feature Request thread ( make sticky )
Load cell support
Full throttle down shift on paddles
Some minor CAN changes:
OEM BMW E46 dashboard RPM
OEM Haldex control for VW/Audi
Allow the baud rate to be set to 500k or 1M, as well as whether to use extended identifiers or not.
Full throttle down shift on paddles
Some minor CAN changes:
OEM BMW E46 dashboard RPM
OEM Haldex control for VW/Audi
Allow the baud rate to be set to 500k or 1M, as well as whether to use extended identifiers or not.
Re: Feature Request thread ( make sticky )
Just being pedantic - why would you want WOT downshifts........surely you'd just hit the limiter?
-
- Posts: 3587
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 12:08 pm
- ECU Model: No ECU
- Location: Norn Iron
Re: Feature Request thread ( make sticky )
Probably only reason for a WOT downshift...is because you somehow ended up in the wrong gear in the first place ? It would be an unusual scenario though.
-
- Posts: 1622
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 1:03 pm
- ECU Model: S40 Pro
- Distributor: DTA
- Firmware Version: 79
Re: Feature Request thread ( make sticky )
Correct. I've had a few requests for this now.stevieturbo wrote:Probably only reason for a WOT downshift...is because you somehow ended up in the wrong gear in the first place ? It would be an unusual scenario though.
It's not as unusual as you'd think. I've seen some logs where drivers are consistently able to try to down shift less than 50rpm too soon, and don't realise they haven't shifted down.
It's usually on multiple downshifts though, so downshifting 3 instead of 4 times, and trying to leave the chicane a gear too high. Rather than lift, press the clutch, downshift, carry on, just pull the paddle.
Re: Feature Request thread ( make sticky )
Any plans for CAN based lambda? Ie for the likes of either motec or Link lambda CAN controllers?
https://www.motec.com.au/lambda-current ... directory/
http://dealers.linkecu.com/can-lambda
Would free up an analog input, more accurate, and better sensor diagnostics.
https://www.motec.com.au/lambda-current ... directory/
http://dealers.linkecu.com/can-lambda
Would free up an analog input, more accurate, and better sensor diagnostics.
-
- Posts: 1622
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 1:03 pm
- ECU Model: S40 Pro
- Distributor: DTA
- Firmware Version: 79
Re: Feature Request thread ( make sticky )
Definitely, on the enhancements list.
-
- Posts: 3587
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 12:08 pm
- ECU Model: No ECU
- Location: Norn Iron
Re: Feature Request thread ( make sticky )
Both their CAN lambda units are ridiculously expensive though.
And the Link unit requires data to be sent to the device before it will power the sensor etc and start sending data back. ie it will not operate if the engine is not running.
But yes, lambda onboard, or via serial/CAN properly rather than an analogue input is a better option.
And the Link unit requires data to be sent to the device before it will power the sensor etc and start sending data back. ie it will not operate if the engine is not running.
But yes, lambda onboard, or via serial/CAN properly rather than an analogue input is a better option.
Re: Feature Request thread ( make sticky )
Are there any cheaper ones? The link one is around $500nzd, a innovate or other similar analog one is around $300.stevieturbo wrote:Both their CAN lambda units are ridiculously expensive though.
Is that not half the point, ie, not run the lambda probe before engine start to prevent sensor damage? (especially on cold starts etc, condensation in exhaust)And the Link unit requires data to be sent to the device before it will power the sensor etc and start sending data back. ie it will not operate if the engine is not running.
-
- Posts: 3587
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 12:08 pm
- ECU Model: No ECU
- Location: Norn Iron
Re: Feature Request thread ( make sticky )
I'm not saying there are cheaper ones...I'm saying both of those are expensive for a wideband, more so the Motec although that's par for the course.
And the point is...it wont be a simple matter if getting the CAN wideband and the DTA receiving the data, the DTA will actually need to be able to send and receive.
And the point is...it wont be a simple matter if getting the CAN wideband and the DTA receiving the data, the DTA will actually need to be able to send and receive.