Fiat Punto GT

Document your project with images, pictures, etc., and share with others.
Page
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 12:06 pm
ECU Model: S60 Pro
Distributor: Local Dealer GR
Firmware Version: 62

Re: Fiat Punto GT

Post by Page »

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I managed to make the valve to work ... Stevie was absolutely right

but, but

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

This would take me, probably, only a decade to make it work properly .

So, i was out fooling myself trying to stop the hunting ... The thing is that engine feels absolutely better as far i drive out of the idle :lol:

These are right now the current settings .
When the fan works, idle stop hunting
When the fan not working, starts a low frequency hunt around the 900 rpm target.
Leaving the idle (e.g) start moving and reaching a traffic light, eventually coming back to idle . Stays stable to about 900 and then hunting season is on,
until the load of the fan is on and stabilise the idle .

Image
Image
Image
Image
Page
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 12:06 pm
ECU Model: S60 Pro
Distributor: Local Dealer GR
Firmware Version: 62

Re: Fiat Punto GT

Post by Page »

i was thinking of make my own accurate columns or may say better my own columns which interest me more .
May be do this today .
Although is christmas time (family maters), but it's kinda fun playing with DTA .

One question tho, when i mark many cells that wanted to be the same value with one move on a map, how you do that ?
tried everything i know but haven't make it happen right now.
stevieturbo
Posts: 3588
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 12:08 pm
ECU Model: No ECU
Location: Norn Iron

Re: Fiat Punto GT

Post by stevieturbo »

Firstly. RTFM

Then highlight the cells you want to change then press F5

It's a shitty way to have to make changes, but that's just how DTA offer it.
Page
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 12:06 pm
ECU Model: S60 Pro
Distributor: Local Dealer GR
Firmware Version: 62

Re: Fiat Punto GT

Post by Page »

Hi Guys and Merry Christmas,
As far for the idle issue, i found out that my hardware ain't right
Wrong 1,
The bleed pipe from the idle valve was bleeding out to the atmosphere.
I thought that it could be able to close it completely when comes out of the operating range .I was wrong, so i sort it out and fix that by connecting it to the T.B/ intercooler pipe .
And because it was air that was missing out from the system, I was led to redone the fuel map .
Now on it works really well, with a solid idle at 900 rpm and with idle valve disabled . ( or any other help )
And because it is disabled, it is resting in an slight open position that keeps the system in balance .
Thus of the slight open of the valve is leading me to realize the wrong 2 .
Wrong 2,
My throttle body ain't having throttle stops nor a screw bleed .
It closes completely when foot is off and relies only on idle valve rest opening .
As i can understand, I gotta make a bleed screw to the system aiming 100-200 rpm more than the target idle, in order to set the idle and then engage the idle valve.
In your view, i should adjust the idle with an idle screw plus the resting opening of the idle valve disabled or completely closed, like it was never there ?

_____________________________________________________

If you please explain to me the meaning of "Durations in turns" and "Pedal speed measuring time "
Please can you give me an example so i can understand it .
The user manual have a poor explanation (or i don't get it ) and just because it is a trial and error function, i would like to have in mind the functions of these two parameters of how they apply in real action .

Image
stevieturbo
Posts: 3588
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 12:08 pm
ECU Model: No ECU
Location: Norn Iron

Re: Fiat Punto GT

Post by stevieturbo »

Both fairly self explanatory.

Pedal speed measuring time = If this is set to 1 second, the ecu only looks every second to see what the pedal ( ie your foot ) is doing.
So a higher time could make response sluggish. Or it could be used to filter out a jumpy throttle. Too fast and it may miss or be too responsive and keep adding fuel when not needed.

Duration in turns. Fuel is applied for this number of engine turns
Page
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 12:06 pm
ECU Model: S60 Pro
Distributor: Local Dealer GR
Firmware Version: 62

Re: Fiat Punto GT

Post by Page »

Many, many thanks Stevie !
Now its clear for me
and again, many thanks mate .
katana
Posts: 457
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2013 6:08 pm
ECU Model: S60 Pro
Firmware Version: 29

Re: Fiat Punto GT

Post by katana »

Venting the boost line to atmosphere is down and dirty way of increasing dynamic boost in that the boost over and above spring pressure that would normally act on the diaphragm and open the gate is vented. Not the most efficient way and does boost spike.
It used to be single stage ie switch and air valve - now you control the valve via PWM to vary the boost. But it's still old skool! Now standalone boost controllers allow tighter control over the gate by applying boost or separate pressurised air source to both side of the diaphragm and varying the pressure either side via a MAP sensor monitoring the plenum pressure.
See http://www.ams1000.com/
stevieturbo
Posts: 3588
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 12:08 pm
ECU Model: No ECU
Location: Norn Iron

Re: Fiat Punto GT

Post by stevieturbo »

Unless you're a dedicated drag racer, I simply cannot see the point/value of the AMS1000...plus it costs about as much as an S60 ecu if not more.

And you can blow air into both chambers with any PWM based boost control setup if you desire.

I'm sure the AMS is good....but then so are a lot of other things I'd be buying well before it.
User avatar
ignitionautosport
Posts: 577
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 5:30 am
ECU Model: S80 Pro
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Fiat Punto GT

Post by ignitionautosport »

stevieturbo wrote:Unless you're a dedicated drag racer, I simply cannot see the point/value of the AMS1000...plus it costs about as much as an S60 ecu if not more.

And you can blow air into both chambers with any PWM based boost control setup if you desire.

I'm sure the AMS is good....but then so are a lot of other things I'd be buying well before it.
I agree, I often think people just cbf setting their shit up properly so spend $$ instead.
| '94 GSR Lancer | '96 Toyota Carib 20V | '83 Toyota Starlet | www.ignitionautosport.co.nz |
katana
Posts: 457
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2013 6:08 pm
ECU Model: S60 Pro
Firmware Version: 29

Re: Fiat Punto GT

Post by katana »

Interesting comments and to a degree I would agree but the numbers of bike drag racers that thought they could get by with the on-board ECU boost controls even from Motec & such top end kit have been proved over and again. Personally, I use the AMS on my road bike in GPS mode which makes putting a potential 370hp through a contact patch the size of your palm considerably easier. The car guys didn't think they needed sophisticated control until they started coming up against others launching harder and using more power than they could put to the ground! Power is nothing without control! ;)
And forgive my ignorance but I didn't realise DTA featured two independent PWM channels to control air ported to both sides of the gate valve! So excuse me if I cbf'd to waste my time poncing around with something that doesn't do what I need - so choose to spend my $$ / ££ on something that does. I guess you'd still advocate integral wastegates rather than standalone as it involves spending money! :|
Post Reply